Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008

Enterprises Are Already in the Cloud

By , co-founder and CEO

Stacey at GigaOM just wrote an interesting piece on 10 reasons why Enterprises aren’t ready for the Cloud. Of course we couldn’t let this opportunity pass without adding a little perspective from inside the Box.

Here’s a fact: Box.net has users in most every Fortune 1000 company, and we’ve seen our new collaboration functionality used in hundreds of these organizations already. Each of these companies have tools that are already made available to their employees. However, the inflexibility, inaccessibility, and cumbersome nature of these tools make them wildly unusable. Traditional software isn’t working for these organizations. Sharepoint, eRoom/Documentum, etc. just aren’t doing the job for the end-user — not in the era of Facebook, Flickr, and Youtube showing you that sharing information can be easy, flexible, and fun. Whether it’s on Box.net, Salesforce, PBwiki, Gmail, or WebEx, more Enterprise data is online than anyone can estimate. The key is not to be afraid of the Cloud, but rather to adopt it when it makes the most sense, and to make sure the tools being adopted are secure and meet the standards you’re used to. I can tell you — from the front lines– that there is already more demand than necessary to satiate a very large industry; I’m sure my peers in this space would agree.

That said, the article does raise relevant points around security, seamlessness, and reliability. I have a few ways to respond:

Firstly, nothing specifically precludes Cloud-based services from being just as or more secure and reliable than an in-house solution. In fact, in many cases, Box.net is a more secure way to share information than traditional methods (physical sharing, email, FTP, etc) — we have SSL encryption on transit, access logging, as well as loads of network, software, and hardware security that most Enterprises won’t even think to implement. Our architecture and business model supports managing data for millions of users, which means we ultimately need to be more reliable and tested than most off-the-shelf solutions you can expect to implement in-house. In addition, when provisioning web-based solutions, you’re guaranteed up-to-date software: bugs are patched nearly instantly, new features are added regularly, integrations are always being launched, etc.– something the software and hardware guys can’t compete with.

Secondly, beyond the ‘sexiness’ and ‘hype’ of Cloud-based services, there’s an even more salient point to be made: these tools are used because many departments or individuals absolutely need web-based tools to get their job done. People are working from here and there, collaborating with colleagues and vendors from anywhere, and selling to customers everywhere. All of these circumstances require the Web, not an intranet or housed software/hardware. It’s the SaaS providers responsibility to make their software and solutions useful for the end-users, and acceptable by the Enterprise.

I could go on to add points about how SaaS can save a business thousands or millions of dollars; how it makes organizations more agile and competitive; how it enables broader collaboration and knowledge sharing, getting the most out of any employee; or how it’s actually unstoppable because users can adopt these tools on their own (and shutting them off will only inhibits productivity and success), but I think these points have all been made before and are well understood. So whether or not the Enterprise is ‘ready’ for the Cloud, the fact is they’re already in the Cloud, and this Cloud is only getting bigger.

Aaron Levie

By ,

co-founder and CEO

See all of Aaron's articles.